As major storms approach the mouths of the three inlets in New Jersey, the major gates that can be closed can be closed, the barriers closed will cut some of the two bays in half and be removed as part of a $19 billion $16 billion plan. The Gulf of Aden, one of the main sources of storm damage on the Jersey Coast, was flooded
After five years of investigation, federal and state officials issued recommendations Thursday that will radically change the look of some landmarks on the beach.
It will also be one of the most ambitious and costly efforts of any US state to combat the Gulf floods. This is primarily due to flooding caused by the hidden rise in water level in inland coastal bays rather than by waves breaking through ocean barriers.
While ocean waves caused significant damage during Hurricane Sandy in 2012, floods in the Gulf of Aden also caused significant damage. In many places it was the main source of property damage during the Sandy era.
“To better protect New Jersey residents, communities and the economy, we need to plan and prepare today for tomorrow’s climate change risks,” said New Jersey environmental commissioner Shawn LaTourette.
These are only plans released by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Department of the Environment: the blueprints. Monmouth County does not have funding for a major project that will run from Neptune to the southern tip of Cape May in the state.
New Jersey eyes $16B plan to fight flooding:
Manasquan requires large storm gates along the Barnegat and Great Egg Harbor entrances. In addition, it will be referred to as the “Gulf Barriers” along a former railroad line that runs along Absecon Bay near Atlantic City and along 52nd Street in Ocean City.
In the middle of these gulf barriers will be a revolving door that can be closed during major storms and a door-like door that will lower into the water to prevent water surges during storms, enclosing about a third. LaTourette said the structures will rise about 20 feet from the water.
Similar barriers have been proposed along the Mississippi River in New York and for waterways in Venice, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. But other places, including Boston, considered the idea, but decided that the costs outweighed the benefits.
Some environmental groups oppose such barriers, fearing that the structures will limit tidal flow and sediment transport and hinder the migration of fish, including striped bass.
Others want more natural solutions, including rehabilitation and expansion of wetlands, building sand dunes and halting construction at the water’s edge.
“It’s not surprising that the Army wants to build a big building: they do,” said Tim Dillingham, executive director of the American Coast Guard, a Coast Guard group. “If there’s only one tool in your kit, it’s the tool you use.”
Dillingham said the state should use more of $16 billion in financing to buy and demolish homes in flood-prone areas. The state already has such a program, but so far no one has bought a single home across the ocean because they don’t want to give up their valuable real estate. Most of the scientists were near inland rivers and other small waterways.
Get in touch with ReportingHour
Credit@ Finance & Commerce